HF4235
Corporation and limited liability company powers related to election activity prohibited.
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)
Related bill: SF4513
AI Generated Summary
- Purpose
This bill would stop corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) from using their powers to influence elections. It defines what counts as "election activity" and adds limits so that corporate entities cannot fund or influence campaigns, candidates, ballot questions, or political parties. It also sets out remedies if a company acts beyond its powers.
Main provisions
Definition added: Election activity
- For corporations and LLCs, election activity means paying, contributing, or expending anything of value (money or in-kind) to:
- promote or defeat the nomination or election of a candidate, or
- promote or defeat the success of any political party, political organization, or to promote or defeat ballot questions.
Power limit for corporations (and similarly for LLCs)
- A corporation (and LLC) has powers needed to do its business, but nothing in Minnesota law should be read as giving it the power to participate in or influence any election activity.
Ultra vires and enforcement
- If a corporation acts without power in ways that relate to election activity, courts may:
- enjoin (stop) the action,
- possibly set aside contracts or transactions tied to the unauthorised activity, and
- consider damages or compensation if appropriate.
- The attorney general can use these rules to dissolve or stop the corporation from unauthorized business related to elections.
Ratification and validation
- A defective corporate act or share can still be considered valid if it is ratified or validated through appropriate legal processes.
Similar changes for LLCs and their statutes
- The same election-activity definitions, power limitations, and enforcement mechanisms apply to LLCs (in the sections that cover LLCs).
How this would change existing law
Explicitly narrows the permissible activities of corporations and LLCs by barring them from engaging in election-related activity as defined in the bill.
Adds uniform language across corporate and LLC statutes to prohibit election activity and to spell out consequences for unauthorized actions.
Strengthens enforcement options (injunctions, potential contract relief, dissolution actions by the attorney general) for election-related power violations.
Updates remedies related to defective acts, allowing court ratification or validation to determine the final outcome.
Practical implications and examples
Examples of what would be prohibited
- A company using corporate funds or in-kind resources to back a candidate, oppose a ballot measure, or support/oppose a political party or organization.
- An LLC paying for political advertising or engaging in coordinated efforts to influence an election.
Examples of what remains allowed (subject to normal business purposes)
- Normal business decisions not connected to influencing elections, as long as they do not cross into defined election activity.
Enforcement consequences
- If a company engages in election activity, authorities could seek to stop the action, undo related deals, or dissolve the company in extreme cases.
- Courts could permit compensation in some situations if they void or halt specific transactions.
Summary of the scope
The bill applies to both corporations and LLCs, creating a parallel set of restrictions and remedies across corporate and LLC law.
It defines election activity broadly to include money and in-kind contributions aimed at influencing elections or ballot questions.
Potential concerns and considerations
Administrative burden for businesses to ensure compliance across multiple statutes.
Definitions of election activity may require interpretation in complex corporate structures and political activities.
Clearer guidance may be needed for what counts as in-kind contributions and how to track expenditure.
Relevant Terms election activity; corporation; limited liability company (LLC); in-kind; monetary; contribute; contributing; expending; aid; promote; defeat; nomination; election; ballot question; political party; political organization; ultra vires; enjoin; contract; injunction; ratification; validation; attorney general; dissolve; powers; authority; governance.
Actions
| Date | Chamber | Where | Type | Name | Committee Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 12, 2026 | House | Action | Introduction and first reading, referred to | Commerce Finance and Policy | |
| Showing the 5 most recent stages. This bill has 1 stages in total. Log in to view all stages | |||||
Citations
You must be logged in to view citations.
Progress through the legislative process
Sponsors
You must be logged in to view sponsors.