HF4756

Tax compliance requirements removed for counties.
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)

AI Generated Summary

Purpose

This section creates a way for counties to be relieved from certain state-mandated requirements if following those mandates would be too costly. It targets high-cost mandates tied to property tax rules, with the goal of reducing financial and administrative burdens on counties that have limited resources.

Key Definitions

  • Average levy: The average certified net tax capacity levy for the three taxes payable in the years just before a county applies for relief.
  • Per capita tax base: The county’s adjusted net tax capacity divided by its population.
  • Population: The most recent population estimate or count used for the application year (based on federal census, a special census, or a state demographer estimate).

Main Provisions

  • Relief from state mandates: A county is not required to comply with a state mandate if annual compliance would cost more than a specified percentage of the county’s average levy, or if the county’s per capita tax base is less than 1,500.
  • Eligibility link to thresholds: The relief hinges on the two thresholds above (cost burden relative to average levy, and per capita tax base), with the exact cost percentage defined elsewhere.
  • Application path: A county must apply for relief each year, by June 1 of the year before the year for which relief is sought.
  • Certification decision: The state Commissioner of Revenue determines eligibility and must certify whether the county meets the relief criteria by August 1 of the year the application is submitted.
  • Public notice: By September 1, the commissioner must notify the overseeing agencies about which counties will receive relief in the following year, including a list of qualifying counties.

Relief Process and Timing

  • Annual process: Relief is decided on a year-to-year basis through an annual application and certification process.
  • Oversight and communication: Notifications go to agencies with oversight of mandates, helping coordinate which counties are exempt in the next year.

Exceptions and Limitations

  • Core protections preserved: Counties must still comply with laws that govern financial audits or laws that directly affect residents’ safety and health.
  • Scope limits: Relief applies only to the specified state mandates; other unrelated requirements remain in force.

Significance and Expected Impact

  • Administrative relief for some counties: Smaller or higher-cost counties could experience reduced compliance burdens related to certain state mandates.
  • Tool for fiscal management: Provides a formal mechanism for counties to manage costs associated with mandates while maintaining essential protections.

How this changes current law

  • Introduces a formal, repeatable relief mechanism from certain state mandates based on cost and fiscal capacity.
  • Establishes defined thresholds, application deadlines, and a certification process led by the state Department of Revenue.
  • Requires public notice to track which counties will be relieved in upcoming years.
  • Maintains essential protections in the areas of financial audits and resident safety/health.

Relevant Terms - state mandate - relief - average levy - per capita tax base - population - population estimate - commissioner of revenue - certification - notice - agency with oversight of a mandate - exemptions - financial audit requirements - safety and health of county residents

Bill text versions

Actions

DateChamberWhereTypeNameCommittee Name
March 26, 2026HouseActionIntroduction and first reading, referred toTaxes

Citations

 
[
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "The bill uses the per capita tax base concept defined in Minnesota Statutes section 273.1325 to calculate county-level tax base figures.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "273.1325",
    "subdivision": ""
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Population estimates are to be derived pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 4A.02 (state demographer).",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "4A.02",
    "subdivision": ""
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "References Minnesota Statutes chapter 275 as the framework within which the proposed High Cost Requirements Reduced is to be implemented (the bill adds a new section 275.765).",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "275",
    "subdivision": ""
  }
]

Progress through the legislative process

17%
In Committee
Loading…