Purpose of the Bill

The proposed legislation aims to establish the Consumer Grocery Pricing Fairness Act in Minnesota. Its primary goal is to ensure fair pricing in the grocery sector and to protect smaller retailers and wholesalers from unfair competitive practices by dominant retailers and suppliers.

Main Provisions

• Definitions: The bill provides specific definitions for key terms such as "covered goods," "covered retailer," "covered supplier," "dominant covered retailer," and "price differential," setting clear criteria for who and what is affected by the Act.

• Fair Pricing Regulations: It prohibits suppliers from offering different terms of sale for the same grocery items to different retailers unless justified by differences in distribution efficiencies or other legitimate factors.

• Supplier Obligations: Requires suppliers to offer the same sale terms to all retailers on similar purchase volumes and to disclose anonymized contract terms with dominant retailers upon request.

• Prohibition on Dominant Retailers: Dominant retailers are restricted from using their purchasing power to coerce suppliers into arrangements that would limit the availability of products to smaller retailers or force suppliers into unfair practices.

• Legal Remedies and Enforcement: The bill allows the state attorney general or affected parties to seek legal remedies, including injunctions and civil penalties, against violators. Penalties may be up to one and a half times the actual damages or the price differential experienced.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

• Uniform Sales Terms: Introduces new legal requirements for fair and consistent sales terms across all retailers, aiming to level the playing field for smaller businesses against larger market players.

• Increased Accountability: Establishes a formal mechanism for suppliers to disclose terms and defend themselves from coercive practices by dominant retailers, enhancing transparency and accountability in the market.

Relevant Terms

consumer protection, grocery pricing fairness, civil penalties, antitrust laws, covered goods, covered retailer, covered supplier, dominant retailer, price differential, terms of sale, trade channel, enforcement, attorney general.