SF4312
Appointments not confirmed within 30 days refusal
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)
Related bill: HF4685
AI Generated Summary
Purpose
- To change how quickly state-level appointments that require legislative confirmation must be acted on, and to establish automatic approval if no action is taken within a specified period. It also clarifies that one particular type of appointment is exempt from these rules.
Main Provisions
- Time limits for advice and consent:
- For appointments that only require confirmation by the Senate: If the Senate does not reject or confirm the appointment within a specified number of legislative days after the letter of appointment is received by the President of the Senate, the appointment is deemed approved (consented to) by the Senate.
- For appointments that require confirmation by both the Senate and the House: If neither chamber rejects the appointment nor confirms it within a specified number of legislative days after the later of receiving the appointment letter (either by the Senate President or the House Speaker), the appointment is deemed approved by both chambers.
- Exemption:
- The time-limit rules do not apply to appointments to the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board under section 10A.02.
Scope and Key Terms
- Applies to Minnesota state government appointments that require “advice and consent.”
- The process references specific actors and documents: the Senate, the House of Representatives, the president of the Senate, the speaker of the House, and the “letter of appointment.”
- The changes are codified in Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 15.066 subdivision 3.
Notable Changes to Existing Law
- Introduces automatic approval (deemed consent/approval) if no action is taken within a defined period, instead of leaving appointments in limbo awaiting action.
- Distinguishes between Senate-only confirmations and confirmations by both chambers, with separate timelines.
- Creates an explicit exemption for Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board appointments.
Potential Effects
- Could speed up the appointment process by reducing delays caused by inaction.
- Shifts potential leverage toward the governor's nominees, since lack of timely action can result in automatic approval.
- May reduce debate time for certain appointments, while still requiring formal action for others.
Relevant Terms - advice and consent time limit - appointments - confirmation - rejection - consented to the appointment - deemed approved/consent - Senate - House of Representatives - president of the Senate - Speaker of the House - letter of appointment - legislative days - Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board - section 10A.02 - Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 15.066 subdivision 3 - state government
Actions
| Date | Chamber | Where | Type | Name | Committee Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 11, 2026 | Senate | Action | Introduction and first reading | ||
| March 11, 2026 | Senate | Action | Referred to | State and Local Government | |
| April 07, 2026 | Senate | Action | Author added | ||
| April 23, 2026 | Senate | Action | Author added |
Bill information comes from public records published by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes, the Minnesota House and the Minnesota Senate. AI summaries are written by MinneSlate and are not official. MinneSlate is independent and is not affiliated with the State of Minnesota or the Minnesota Legislature.
Progress through the legislative process
In Committee