Purpose

• The bill aims to ensure homeowners insurance policies in Minnesota do not exclude or unduly limit coverage for damage to a home that is caused by a peace officer performing official duties. In other words, certain policy exclusions would not apply to damage when a peace officer is involved.

Main Provisions

• Prohibits certain exclusions in homeowners insurance policies that would deny or limit coverage for damage to a home caused by a peace officer.
• Amends Minnesota Statutes to update the definitions in section 65A.27, subdivision 1, so the terms used in sections 65A.27 to 65A.304 (and 65A.304) have clear meanings.
• Sets up new or codified law in Minnesota Statutes chapter 65A to govern these provisions, creating a unified framework for how coverage exclusions are treated in these cases.
• Specifies the scope for applying these definitions and rules across the relevant sections (65A.27 through 65A.304 and related provisions).

How It Changes Current Law

• Adds a new requirement that certain exclusions in homeowners insurance policies cannot be used to deny or limit coverage when the damage is caused by a peace officer.
• Introduces or formalizes definitions and terminology to support these provisions, ensuring consistent application across the referenced statute sections.
• Creates a new or clarified statutory framework (within chapter 65A) to govern these changes, replacing or supplementing existing language about exclusions and coverage in these scenarios.

Definitions and Terminology (Key Terms Likely Defined)

• Homeowners insurance policy
• Exclusions (policy exclusions affecting coverage)
• Peace officer (as defined by the new or amended definitions)
• Damage (property damage to a home)
• Coverage (the insurance protection provided by a homeowners policy)
• Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 65A.27 subdivision 1 (and related sections 65A.27 to 65A.302, 65A.304)
• Minnesota Statutes chapter 65A (new coding/organization of the law)

Potential Impacts

• Policyholders could see more consistent coverage decisions when property damage results from a peace officer’s actions.
• Insurance policy language that previously excluded such damage may no longer be allowed to deny coverage.
• Insurers will need to apply the new definitions and rules when handling claims involving damage caused by peace officers.

Implementation Notes

• The changes rely on amended definitions and the codification of new law within chapter 65A to guide how exclusions are treated in these cases.
• Applications would affect how homeowners insurers assess and pay claims for damage linked to peace officer activity.

Relevant Terms - homeowners insurance - exclusions - peace officer - damage - coverage - Minnesota Statutes 65A.27 - Minnesota Statutes 65A.302 - Minnesota Statutes 65A.304 - Minnesota Statutes chapter 65A