SF717
Enforcement prohibition of government vaccine mandates
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)
Related bill: HF2884
AI Generated Summary
Purpose
- This bill aims to limit government-imposed vaccine requirements and to protect individual liberties and privacy by restricting enforcement of vaccine mandates. It also sets a requirement that, for employers in Minnesota, proof of presence of natural antibodies can be used as an alternative to vaccination.
Main Provisions
- Prohibition on government mandates
- No government entity or its subdivisions, agents, designees, or assigns may enforce or try to enforce any mandatory vaccines, vaccine passports, vaccine passes, or vaccine credentials in Minnesota.
- Prohibits enforcement under any mechanism, including federal acts or laws, executive orders, administrative orders, court orders, rules, regulations, statutes, or ordinances.
- Rationale references state sovereignty and the Tenth Amendment, aiming to shield individual liberties and privacy from federal overreach.
- Employer alternative to vaccination
- If an employer operating in Minnesota or employing a Minnesota resident requires vaccination against any infection, the employer must allow proof of presence of natural antibodies as an alternative to vaccination.
- Defines “employer” using the existing Minnesota statute definition (Minnesota Statutes section 177.23 subdivision 6).
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- Adds a new prohibition on government enforcement of any vaccine mandates at all levels (federal, state, and local) through any legal mechanism.
- Creates a statutory requirement that employers recognize natural immunity (proof of presence of natural antibodies) as a valid alternative to vaccination in immunization-related policies.
- Codifies the protections in Minnesota law (proposing coding in Minnesota Statutes chapter 144) and frames the issue as part of state sovereignty and constitutional rights.
Terminology Inclusion
- Government mandates prohibited
- Vaccine mandates / mandatory vaccines
- Vaccine passports / vaccine passes / vaccine credentials
- Immunization / vaccination
- Proof of presence of natural antibodies / natural immunity
- Federal act / federal law / executive order
- Tenth Amendment / states’ rights
- Privacy and liberties
- Employer (as defined in Minnesota statutes)
How to understand the impact
- For individuals: Strengthens protections against government-imposed vaccination requirements and privacy concerns by limiting how vaccines can be mandated.
- For employers: Requires allowing an alternative to vaccination (natural antibodies) in policies that would otherwise require vaccination.
- For government and policy makers: Represents a shift toward limiting government power over health-related mandates and highlighting state sovereignty and individual choice.
Relevant Terms - government mandates prohibited - vaccine mandates - vaccine passports - vaccine passes - vaccine credentials - proof of presence of natural antibodies - natural antibodies / natural immunity - immunization - federal act / executive order - Tenth Amendment - states’ rights - privacy - Minnesota Statutes chapter 144 - employer (Minnesota Statutes section 177.23 subdivision 6)
Actions
| Date | Chamber | Where | Type | Name | Committee Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 27, 2025 | Senate | Action | Introduction and first reading | ||
| January 27, 2025 | Senate | Action | Referred to | State and Local Government | |
| March 24, 2025 | Senate | Action | Author stricken | ||
| February 17, 2026 | Senate | Action | Author added | ||
| Showing the 5 most recent stages. This bill has 4 stages in total. Log in to view all stages | |||||
Citations
You must be logged in to view citations.
Progress through the legislative process
In Committee
Sponsors
You must be logged in to view sponsors.