SF3993

Health plans to credit enrollees for services provided by out-of-network provider at a lower cost than the plan's in-network providers
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)

Related bill: HF4152

AI Generated Summary

Purpose

  • To require health plan companies to credit enrollees who receive health care services from out-of-network providers when the out-of-network cost would be lower than the plan’s in-network cost.
  • To provide a process for enrollees to obtain a good faith cost estimate and to receive an out-of-network credit that lowers the enrollee’s final payment.

Main provisions

  • Good faith cost estimates (Section 62J.81, subdivision 1a)

    • Health plan companies must, within ten business days after a complete request, provide an enrollee (or their designee) with:
    • A good faith estimate of the total payment the plan has contracted for with a specified network provider for a health care service, plus the enrollee’s share (out-of-pocket costs), or
    • The lowest total payment the enrollee would owe for the service from any provider comparable to the out-of-network provider, considering geographic accessibility.
    • The estimate is not a legally binding quote.
    • A complete request includes all information the plan needs to issue the estimate (forms may be required).
  • Definitions used for credits (Section 62J.829)

    • Estimated in-network cost difference: good faith in-network estimate minus the out-of-network estimate.
    • Out-of-network credit: a credit equal to 50% of the estimated in-network cost difference.
    • The plan may ask for documentation of the good faith estimates but cannot require it before the enrollee receives the service.
  • When credits must be issued (Subdivision 2)

    • Plans must issue an out-of-network credit if the enrollee received care from an out-of-network provider and identified a positive estimated in-network cost difference before the service.
    • The credit equals 50% of the estimated difference.
    • The credit may be applied as an offset to the enrollee’s next due payment and should be applied immediately unless the enrollee requests otherwise.
    • The enrollee’s obligation to use the credit is subject to a limit on total credits per plan per enrollee (see below for the cap note).
  • Limits and restrictions (Subdivision 2)

    • Credits are not available if:
    • The service is provided outside the United States, or
    • The enrollee is delinquent on premium payments.
    • There is a maximum total amount of out-of-network credits an enrollee may have with a single health plan (the exact cap is not specified in the provided text).
  • No punitive design changes (Subdivision 3)

    • Health plans may not impose cost-sharing, utilization review limits, or premium increases that would reduce an enrollee’s ability to receive or use an out-of-network credit.
    • A premium or cost-sharing change tied to the credit is considered a limit on the enrollee’s ability to receive the benefit.
  • Notices of credit balance (Subdivision 4)

    • Plans must provide an enrollee with a statement of their credit balance at least periodically (frequency is described in the bill but not specified in the excerpt).
  • Credit balance treatment at plan termination (Subdivision 5)

    • If a plan ends for any reason, the plan must pay the available out-of-network credit balance to the enrollee, except in cases of nonpayment of premiums, material misrepresentation, or fraud.
  • Application timing (Subdivision 6)

    • If applying the credit before an enrollee meets their deductible would affect tax-advantaged accounts (like an HSA) or catastrophic coverage eligibility, the credit applies only after the enrollee meets the deductible.
  • Enforcement (Subdivision 7)

    • The Minnesota Commissioner of Commerce can investigate and enforce these provisions using its existing authority.
  • Related amendment to another statute (Section 3)

    • Adds a reference to “out-of-network credit balance” in Minnesota Statutes, indicating how the credit balance is treated for purposes of subtraction in a related provision.

Significant changes to existing law

  • Creates a formal framework for out-of-network credits:
    • Introduces the concept of an out-of-network credit equal to 50% of the estimated in-network cost difference.
    • Establishes a process for obtaining and applying good faith estimates.
    • Requires disclosures and ongoing credit balance reporting.
    • Adds enforcement by the Commissioner of Commerce.
  • Amends multiple statutes to incorporate the credit system:
    • Adds details to section 62J.81 (disclosures to enrollees) and 62J.829 (credit mechanics) and references to out-of-network credit balances in related statutory provisions (e.g., 290.0132).

How this could affect enrollees and plans

  • Enrollees could receive a 50% credit when using an out-of-network provider if the out-of-network cost difference is positive and before the service is performed.
  • Credits can be applied immediately to reduce the enrollee’s next payment, and balances must be tracked and disclosed.
  • Plans must provide timely good faith estimates and cannot condition the credit on obtaining additional documentation after services are performed.
  • The bill imposes safeguards to prevent plans from using credits to justify higher premiums, more cost-sharing, or other limitations on benefits.

Enforcement and oversight

  • The Commissioner of Commerce would have authority to investigate and enforce these provisions.

Relevant terms

  • out-of-network credit
  • in-network cost difference
  • estimated in-network cost difference
  • good faith estimate
  • health plan company
  • enrollee
  • out-of-network services
  • credit balance
  • immediate offset
  • complete request
  • geographic accessibility
  • notice of credit balance
  • enforcement
  • Commissioner of Commerce
  • Section 62J.81
  • Section 62J.829
  • Minnesota Statutes 2024
  • 290.0132 Subd.40
  • deductible
  • out-of-network provider
  • cost sharing
  • premium
  • utilization review
  • misrepresentation
  • fraud

Bill text versions

Actions

DateChamberWhereTypeNameCommittee Name
March 02, 2026SenateActionIntroduction and first reading
March 02, 2026SenateActionReferred toCommerce and Consumer Protection

Citations

 
[
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Mandatory good-faith estimate disclosures to enrollees on request.",
        "Two disclosure options: (a) contracted total payment and enrollee costs; (b) lowest in-network amount for a comparable provider for an out-of-network credit."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Amends Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 62J.81, Subd. 1a to require health plan companies to provide enrollees with a good-faith estimate of costs upon request, offering two disclosure options: (i) total payment and enrollee out-of-pocket costs for a network provider, or (ii) the lowest in-network amount for a provider comparable to an out-of-network provider for an out-of-network credit under §62J.829; estimates are nonbinding and must be delivered within ten business days.",
      "modified": [
        "Introduces disclosure requirements and timelines; establishes nonbinding nature of estimates."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "62J.81",
    "subdivision": "Subd.1a"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Definitions for key terms used in the out-of-network credit provisions."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Adds Subd. 1 (Definitions) to 62J.829, creating definitions used for the cost-sharing credit program, including terms like 'Estimated in-network cost difference' and 'Out-of-network credit'.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "62J.829",
    "subdivision": "Subd.1"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Credit amount equal to 50% of the estimated in-network cost difference.",
        "Plan may require documentation of good-faith estimates before issuing the credit.",
        "Credit applied automatically as an offset to the next due payment."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Sets the amount of the out-of-network credit: equal to 50% of the estimated in-network cost difference; allows plan to require documentation of good-faith estimates; credit can be applied as an offset to the enrollee's next payment.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "62J.829",
    "subdivision": "Subd.2"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Prohibition on design features that limit use of out-of-network credits."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Prohibits plan designs that limit an enrollee's ability to use an out-of-network credit through cost-sharing, utilization review, or premium increases.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "62J.829",
    "subdivision": "Subd.3"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Notice of credit balance required at least every specified number of months."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Requires health plans to provide notice of an enrollee's credit balance at defined intervals, detailing accruals and current balance.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "62J.829",
    "subdivision": "Subd.4"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Plan must pay the available out-of-network credit balance upon termination/expiration."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Governs payment of the credit balance upon plan termination, including conditions for payment.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "62J.829",
    "subdivision": "Subd.5"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Conditional applicability to preserve HSA eligibility and catastrophic plan eligibility."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Application requirements stating that the section applies only after the enrollee has met the deductible if application would affect HSA eligibility under 26 U.S.C. § 223 or catastrophic plan eligibility under 42 U.S.C. § 18022e.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "62J.829",
    "subdivision": "Subd.6"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Enforcement authority aligned with §45.027."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Enforcement provision allowing the Commissioner of Commerce to investigate and enforce under §45.027.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "62J.829",
    "subdivision": "Subd.7"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "New Subd. 40 defining the out-of-network credit balance for tax subtraction purposes."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Adds Subd. 40 to Minnesota Statutes 2024 §290.0132 concerning the out-of-network credit balance; states that the amount paid to an enrollee under §62J.829, Subd.5 is treated as a subtraction for tax purposes.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "290.0132",
    "subdivision": "Subd.40"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "References enforcement authority for the new provisions by linking to the Commissioner of Commerce's authority under §45.027.",
      "modified": [
        "Enforcement framework referencing §45.027."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "45.027",
    "subdivision": ""
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Notes potential impact on Health Savings Account (HSA) eligibility under the Internal Revenue Code.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "26 U.S.C. § 223",
    "subdivision": ""
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Notes potential impact on catastrophic health plan eligibility under the Public Health Service provisions.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "42 U.S.C. § 18022e",
    "subdivision": ""
  }
]

Progress through the legislative process

17%
In Committee
Loading…