HF283
Law on use of force in defense of home and person clarified, Minnesota's self-defense and defense of home laws codified and extended, common law duty to retreat eliminated in certain cases, boundaries of dwelling expanded for purposes of self-defense, presumption created, and rights extended to others defending against forced entry.
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)
Related bill: SF76
AI Generated Summary
This bill from Minnesota, known as the Defense of Dwelling and Person Act of 2025, seeks to update and clarify the state's laws on self-defense and defense of one's home. Key points of the legislation include:
Elimination of the Duty to Retreat: The bill removes the common law requirement to retreat when facing threats outside of one's home, allowing individuals to use force, including deadly force, in self-defense without the need to retreat.
Expanding the Definition of 'Dwelling': The definition of a dwelling is broadened to include any temporary or permanent living accommodation, such as motor vehicles, tents, and watercraft, along with their immediate surroundings like porches and decks.
Presumption of Reasonable Belief: If someone forcibly or stealthily enters or attempts to enter your dwelling or occupied vehicle, there's an assumption that you have a reasonable belief of imminent peril which justifies defensive action, including deadly force.
Specific Circumstances for Using Deadly Force: Deadly force can be used if it is believed necessary to prevent a felony in the dweller’s place, or to prevent imminent bodily harm or death due to a felony.
Conditions Where the Presumption Does Not Apply: The presumption does not apply if the person against whom force is used is a lawful resident or visitor of the dwelling or vehicle, or if the person has legal custody over someone in the dwelling or vehicle. Additionally, it doesn’t apply to acts against licensed peace officers performing their duties lawfully.
Immunity from Prosecution: Individuals are protected from criminal prosecution for using force in defense, compliant with this statute, provided the force was justified.
Burden of Proof: In criminal trials, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the actions of the defendant were not justifiable if there is any evidence supporting the defendant’s claims of self-defense or defense of others.
Overall, this bill aims to fortify the rights of individuals to protect themselves and their property, clarify circumstances under which defensive force is justified, and provide legal protections for those who act in self-defense under these defined circumstances.
Actions
| Date | Chamber | Where | Type | Name | Committee Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 10, 2025 | House | Action | Introduction and first reading, referred to | Public Safety Finance and Policy | |
| February 13, 2025 | House | Action | Author added | ||
| February 17, 2025 | House | Action | Author added | ||
| Showing the 5 most recent stages. This bill has 3 stages in total. Log in to view all stages | |||||
Citations
You must be logged in to view citations.
Progress through the legislative process
Sponsors
You must be logged in to view sponsors.